THE STAR IN THE SEA

Up to this point, we have written about the fall of mankind brought about by our disobedience to God’s laws through the evil influences and teachings of a false servant and his followers. So let us now turn our scrutiny towards the one example of a Child of God that this world was magnanimously given. To understand this divine being, we have to study everything in His life, from how differently He behaved and spoke in comparison with the mortals of His time. To accomplish this, we will begin at the beginning with his birth. In this article, we will analyse what made his birth different from that of his cousin John the Baptist, considered to be the forerunner to the coming of Christ. [i] Therefore, we will start at the beginning and study the differences in their births, according to the Bible, in order to find the path that will lead to the only true salvation, that of being born divine like Christ.

               The first thing we must understand is that Jesus’ father, according to the flesh, was Joseph, whose name means ‘may He (Jehovah) add.’[ii] The ridiculous story that Mary became pregnant by a dove is an invention of the Church because they wish to ensure that no one else can accomplish a divine birth. To believe in the dove story is to believe that God went against His own rules on the laws of reproduction for earthly species. When explaining to Nicodemus about reincarnation, Jesus says that flesh gives birth to flesh,[iii] and a little later he adds to this conversation that “just as Moses lifted the snake in the desert, so the Son of Man must be lifted that everyone who believes in him may have eternal life.” [iv]This snake in the desert is an image of the male reproductive organs, which up to now has produced nothing but spiritually sterile children for God. This sentence of Jesus’ explains that Moses’ snake, or rather his descendants, his people, were like the desert, unproductive (barren) in the eyes of God. These two sentences support the notion that Jesus, like everyone else born on this planet, had a corporeal father according to the flesh. He makes these remarks to debunk the Church’s teaching on this subject and to say that anyone who believes and understands him will be allowed to give birth to divine children (have eternal life) one day. The greatest difference between Jesus and us is that, according to the spirit, He belonged to God, while we have for a spiritual father the Devil,[v] which explains why we act so terribly towards one another. 

In Luke’s version of this event, there were two women’s lives that were affected by Gabriel’s official visit to that corner of the world.  The first affected was Mary’s older cousin Elizabeth and then Mary herself. The differences and similarities within their stories are extremely interesting.  To begin with, we must study the background of each couple in order to better analyze the situations. To begin with, Elizabeth and her husband Zacharias were descended from the priestly clan of Aaron, who in turn was a descendant of the priestly line of Levi.[vi]  Zacharias worked in the temple.  Mary and Joseph seem to be humble people, allegedly descended from the line of David, a word which means beloved. Joseph worked with wood as a carpenter. Elizabeth was said to be old and barren, while Mary was believed to be very young since she declared herself a virgin. Similarly, both women up to the visit of Gabriel were childless, but the difference within the stories hinges on what was divulged to each.

The first person within the story that Gabriel appeared to was Zacharias, who was a priest working in the temple when the event happened.[vii]  Here is the first point at which we see a divergence in the two women's stories.  The angel Gabriel appeared not to Elizabeth but to Zacharias in the temple, revealing the future birth of his son. Since Gabriel did not talk to Elizabeth, this establishes that she did not personally receive any insight from Him concerning the future happy event.  He spoke only to Zacharias “the priest”, who was at that point performing the temple ritual of burning incense (an action that the prophet Isaiah said that the Lord found detestable,[viii] therefore proving that as a priest he was not, if truth be told, in line with God’s directives. Moreover, Zacharias was not allowed to tell Elizabeth anything about this heavenly visit, including the knowledge that their son would be “great in the eyes of the Lord” due to the fact that the father was rendered mute for not believing the words of the divine envoy.[ix] This passage is very symbolic, as the image suggests that priests, who are alleged to work for God, are unable to deliver the Lord’s words to the mother (s). They are rendered mute because they do not want to hear (and obey) the directives of THE WORD, which they fear. The fear is that this heavenly teaching (the Word) will allow mothers to create other children like Jesus and therefore put an end to their authority over her.

Elizabeth, who was considered old and barren at this point in the story, only becomes pregnant after her priestly husband has been silenced by God’s envoy. So symbolically, that would mean that she was no longer under his tutelage, his spoken word, and under these conditions, away from his influences, she produced what Jesus said to be “Among those born of women there has not risen anyone greater than John the Baptist.”  Unfortunately, probably due to her religious heritage and education, Jesus went on to say, “yet he who is least in the kingdom of heaven is greater than he”,[x] therefore indicating that John had not been born spiritually divine.

How does this situation affect Elizabeth?  First of all, it is imperative to remember that she was no longer subject to her husband’s priestly SPIRITUAL INFLUENCE, for he had been rendered mute by Gabriel and remained so until his son’s birth.  She then decides to remain in seclusion during her pregnancy except for Mary’s visit.[xi] This seclusion meant keeping away from all outside influences, as well as the religious aspect surrounding her husband’s work, especially since he could not talk about them. Finally, it was written that she was happy and grateful towards God for her new condition.[xii]  All of this helped to shape and condition her unborn child.  Furthermore, one must also wonder what Mary shared with her cousin about her encounters with Gabriel during their three-month stay together.

  Now let us examine Gabriel’s visit to Mary. Right from the beginning of this narrative, we read that it was to Mary and not to Joseph that the angel Gabriel engaged. Here, she is seen as the important piece within the relationship between God and mankind. It’s a momentous meeting between the two that has been underrated in its importance. Within our patriarchal world, the fact that the angel Gabriel ignores Joseph to educate Mary on her very important function as a mother and as the only gateway a soul has for entering into this world has been intentionally overlooked by priests. To compensate for this lack of inclusion within the story, the church and their ministers have falsified the knowledge that Jesus had an earthly father for that of a supernatural one. They did this by suggesting, through their interpretation of the event, that her child was not Joseph’s according to the flesh but someone else’s child, given the name of Dove.  This would subtly suggest that she was an adulterer, and all because they did not like the fact that the Bible clearly indicates that both fathers have been in some way silenced or ignored as less important than the mother’s task in these narratives. Chapter 1 of Luke’s Gospel seems to be saying that men beyond the physical conception (seminal) do not have as great a mission when creating a pure temple, a perfect body that would hold a spiritually divine child as the mother has.

Let us now return to the most important player beside the angel Gabriel in this epic story. The etymology of the word Mary means ‘sea’.[xiii] This tends to tie in with the image of the mother carrying a child (Ark) on her maternal waters.  The arrival of Gabriel was to implicitly explain to Mary how to go about accomplishing this great responsibility she had been requested to realise. So what was she asked to do? In the book of Revelation chapter twenty-one, there is mention of the Holy City, dressed as a bride. One must understand that this Holy City will never be built in the material sense of brick and mortar.  The Holy City mentioned here will be made of flesh. The Holy City coming down, out of heaven, symbolizes the purified woman because it is the mother who populates a city. When she truly understands her great role, that of creating perfect temples (bodies) for divine children like Jesus, then at that point she will have truly reached the stage or the position of being spiritually married to God. That is the mother’s greatest mission in this world, for only she was given the capacity to achieve this work of co-creation with God.  

  Let us be clear: a mother can call a soul and clothe it, but spiritual divinity can only be given by God. This is something that all souls (spirits) can work towards, but in the end, divinity is God’s gift to give. The mother can, on the other hand, transfer or eliminate good or bad influences that remain in the flesh, which either strengthen or weaken it.  Satan understood this concept when he launched his assault on mankind’s spiritual pursuit in heaven, as well as in Eden with Eve, by having everyone concentrate on the material world.  It is by influencing our flesh that Lucifer turned us away from God. Jesus said that the spirit was willing, but the flesh was weak.[xiv] At that moment, as Gabriel educated her and explained the means on how to procced, that she accepted the role to be the handmaiden of the Lord. So let us be very clear that the role that Mary accepted was to work in conjunction with God to create a perfect body (temple) that would host a spiritually divine soul. 

One wonders what Gabriel said to the couple in order for them to accept this momentous assignment? He, in all probability, blessed the couple and especially Mary’s womb. We know that at this point she was not pregnant, for Gabriel said, “You will be with child and give birth to a son, and you are to give him the name Jesus.”[xv] This sentence was definitely in the future tense.

With the Fall of Lucifer and his followers, the flesh has been under the influence of Satan and all of his dark criminal attitudes, so it has been impossible to find truly pure people on this planet.  Mary was chosen because she was, as she herself admitted, a virgin, meaning that she was pure of thoughts, having few worldly experiences.  With no immoral and dissolute thoughts or actions, her body was able to stay on God’s high spiritual frequency.  It also allowed Jesus’ high spiritual vibration to connect with her.  In other words, because she was not sullied with base, dense, or disorderly thoughts of the flesh, she became the physical attraction point for his soul. One can only believe that it was through the virtuous practices by her ancestral lineage (line of David) in observing God’s laws that allowed Mary to be prepared to be His (God’s) handmaiden. This is the true image behind the Bible’s words that she was a virgin, because she did not have any spiritual blemishes within her. Here was a picture of a young woman who had not been at that moment of time corrupted by her environment.  This meant she had not developed vices of any kind that would have sullied her and the flesh she would be creating for her child.

Let us try to explain this new concept scientifically. Mary was ready to give birth to a divine child because of her virginal state of physical and mental purity. A virginal state that had been prepared by her ancestors who must have observed the laws and/or virtues of God. This allowed her blood, which feeds the body, to be pure. Due to this virginal state of purity, the Holy Spirit was able to project a high spiritual vibration into her so that her blood and flesh became ready for the conception of a divine child.  This is what was meant that the power of the Most High will overshadow you.[xvi] Mary’s pure, virginal state of her body, due to the lack of evil in her, allowed Jesus’ high spiritual vibration to descend into her womb.  At that point in time, her spiritual vibration was so in conjunction with the purity of her blood (blood which affects the creation of a body, blood which feeds the embryo), that it permitted a being with a high spiritual vibration to use this gateway and develop a corporeal temple worthy of its status.  Such a high spiritual vibration did Mary’s barely conceived unborn child have, that when she visited her older cousin and the two women greeted each other, Elizabeth’s unborn child leaped within her womb with joy.[xvii] Here the difference between these two children was that their individual vibrations would allow one to be born great and the other divine.

Everyone born on this planet is here for having supported Lucifer and his rebellion in Heaven.  Rebellion that left the material flesh we need to cover our soul sullied with the corruption that originated from his and his followers’ dark and dense teachings. Corruption that took us away from the LIGHT (divine vibration) and made our bodies and souls too heavy with sin to be allowed to stay in Heaven. This absence of God’s LIGHT has led us into decadence and degeneracy, especially after the collapse of Eden by the intrigues of the serpent/priest. What Gabriel's visit to Mary means is that we can change our destiny and return to God.  By trying to conform and reconcile ourselves to the virtues and laws of God, we can earn the right to reincarnate within a mother who has a higher spiritual vibrancy within her. In time, this will eliminate the evil influences of Hell; that keeps us prisoners.

                                                                                                                 Nobel

[i] The Westminster Dictionary of the Bible p. 318   /   Bible: Luke 7:27

[ii] The Westminster Dictionary of the Bible p.328

[iii] Bible: John 3:6

[iv] Ibid: John 3:14

[v]  Ibid: John 8:44

[vi] The Westminster Dictionary of the Bible p. 318

[vii] Bible: Luke 1:8-11

[viii] Ibid: Isaiah 1:13

[ix] Ibid: Luke 1:20

[x]  Ibid: Luke 7:28

[xi] Ibid: Luke 1:40

[xii] Ibid: Luke 1:24-25

[xiii] Encyclopédie des Prénoms: Frédérique de Gravelaine p.205

[xiv] Bible: Matthew 26:41

[xv]  Ibid: Luke 1:31

[xvi] Ibid: Luke 1:35

[xvii] Ibid: 1:41